Code RadarLOCAL SAST GATE
AccountGitHubInstall Radar

Secret scanning guide

See how Secret scanning guide fits local review, which evidence Code Radar produces, where coverage ends, and how trusted findings move into CI.

Apply this guide locallyInspect product evidence
radar scan . --quick

What Secret scanning guide means here.

This guide answers what is secret scanning directly, separates the concept from adjacent categories, and connects the decision to a practical local review workflow without overstating Code Radar coverage.

Guide

Evidence to inspect

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

CriterionEvidence to inspectBoundary
Input scopeSelected files, configuration, scan mode, and enabled rules.Only included paths and configured checks are evaluated.
Finding detailFile, line, rule ID, severity, explanation, and repair direction.Illustrative output is not a result from your repository.
Workflow handoffLocal result, report format, agent context, and optional CI signal.Enable exports or CI only when the workflow needs them.
Decision fitUse the same criteria on a real repository before choosing a plan or tool.No universal winner or guaranteed outcome is claimed.
Guide

Apply this guide locally

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

Apply this guide locally

The problem this page helps clarify

The useful question is where Secret scanning guide changes the review loop: what enters the scan, who acts on a finding, and which evidence moves forward. API keys, private keys, hardcoded tokens, pre-commit checks, and reviewed remediation.

  • Audience: Developers preventing credential leaks before commit, review, or merge.
  • Focus: API keys, private keys, hardcoded tokens, pre-commit checks, and reviewed remediation.
  • Review question: What does Secret scanning guide cover in practice?

Coverage and concrete signals

For Secret scanning guide, inspect the concrete scope below instead of relying on a category label. The affected file, secret-like value category, redaction path, and replacement workflow.

  • Focus: API keys, private keys, hardcoded tokens, pre-commit checks, and reviewed remediation.
  • Workflow: Workflow: API keys · private keys · Git hooks · credential rotation
  • Coverage and concrete signals: API keys, private keys, Git hooks, credential rotation
FocusExact file location, rule context, severity, confidence, and remediation guidance.Boundary
API keys, private keys, hardcoded tokens, pre-commit checks, and reviewed remediation.The affected file, secret-like value category, redaction path, and replacement workflow.Secret scanners need rotation and incident response when a real credential has already escaped.

From local signal to shared gate.

Secret scanning guide: Use the smallest workflow that proves value. Each later step should reuse evidence the team already understands. API keys, private keys, hardcoded tokens, pre-commit checks, and reviewed remediation.

StepCommand or actionDecision
1Run a quick local scanIs the signal useful?
2Inspect and repair findingsIs the fix specific and reproducible?
3Export portable evidenceDoes the reviewer need SARIF, JSON, or HTML?
4Promote the trusted threshold to CIWhich severity should block a pull request?
radar scan . --quick
radar scan . --format sarif --fail-on high

Evidence to inspect before you trust the result.

Secret scanning guide: A useful result must be explainable to a developer and portable to the next review surface. Inspect the concrete evidence below before changing team policy. The affected file, secret-like value category, redaction path, and replacement workflow.

  • Workflow: API keys · private keys · Git hooks · credential rotation
  • Exact file location, rule context, severity, confidence, and remediation guidance.
  • Terminal output, SARIF, JSON, or HTML artifacts generated from the same finding set.
  • Source stays in the workspace or CI runner where the scan executes.

Good fit and limits

Use Secret scanning guide when Developers preventing credential leaks before commit, review, or merge. Keep the boundary explicit: Secret scanners need rotation and incident response when a real credential has already escaped.

Run the local proof before adopting a shared gate.

  • Good fit: Developers preventing credential leaks before commit, review, or merge.
  • Not a fit / do not overreach: Secret scanners need rotation and incident response when a real credential has already escaped.

Questions to verify before rollout

These questions keep the decision tied to observable evidence rather than a broad product promise.

What does Secret scanning guide cover in practice?

Secret scanning guide: The practical scope is API keys, private keys, hardcoded tokens, pre-commit checks, and reviewed remediation.. Start with the listed entities or files and confirm the result on representative code.

Which evidence should I inspect for Secret scanning guide?

Secret scanning guide: Inspect The affected file, secret-like value category, redaction path, and replacement workflow. Keep the source location, rule or comparison context, and exported artifact together.

What should I not infer from Secret scanning guide?

Secret scanning guide: Do not infer universal coverage. Secret scanners need rotation and incident response when a real credential has already escaped. Use the relevant comparison or workflow page to test the boundary before changing policy.

What should I try first for Secret scanning guide?

Secret scanning guide: Start with a local run, review one real finding, then choose the linked report, agent, CI, or trust workflow that matches the next decision.

Feature: secrets scannerChoose the next page that matches the remaining implementation or evaluation step.Feature: git hooksChoose the next page that matches the remaining implementation or evaluation step.Security: securityChoose the next page that matches the remaining implementation or evaluation step.
Guide

Start with the problem you need to solve.

Open page →
InstallInstall Radar

Run a local scan on a real repository.

ProofSee sample report

Inspect the fields and formats in a sample finding.

Local SASTLocal SAST for Developers and CI

Developer-first static application security testing that scans source locally, emits SARIF for GitHub code scanning, and gives coding agents deterministic fix context.

Validate the workflow on your own code.

Start with one local scan, inspect the evidence, and expand to reports, agents, or CI only when the signal is useful.

Apply this guide locallyInspect product evidence