Code RadarLOCAL SAST GATE
AccountGitHubInstall Radar

What is software composition analysis?

See how What is software composition analysis? fits local review, which evidence Code Radar produces, where coverage ends, and how trusted findings move into CI.

Apply this guide locallyInspect product evidence
radar scan . --quick

What software composition analysis means here.

This guide answers what is sca directly, separates the concept from adjacent categories, and connects the decision to a practical local review workflow without overstating Code Radar coverage.

Guide

Evidence to inspect

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

CriterionEvidence to inspectBoundary
Input scopeSelected files, configuration, scan mode, and enabled rules.Only included paths and configured checks are evaluated.
Finding detailFile, line, rule ID, severity, explanation, and repair direction.Illustrative output is not a result from your repository.
Workflow handoffLocal result, report format, agent context, and optional CI signal.Enable exports or CI only when the workflow needs them.
Decision fitUse the same criteria on a real repository before choosing a plan or tool.No universal winner or guaranteed outcome is claimed.
Guide

Apply this guide locally

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

Apply this guide locally

The problem this page helps clarify

The useful question is where software composition analysis changes the review loop: what enters the scan, who acts on a finding, and which evidence moves forward. SCA concepts, advisory evidence, transitive dependencies, and where SCA fits in review.

  • Audience: Developers learning how dependency and lockfile risk differs from source-code risk.
  • Focus: SCA concepts, advisory evidence, transitive dependencies, and where SCA fits in review.
  • Review question: What does software composition analysis cover in practice?

Coverage and concrete signals

For software composition analysis, inspect the concrete scope below instead of relying on a category label. A lockfile example, advisory identifier, affected package, and a clear remediation path.

  • Focus: SCA concepts, advisory evidence, transitive dependencies, and where SCA fits in review.
  • Workflow: Workflow: lockfiles · advisories · transitive dependencies · SBOM context
  • Coverage and concrete signals: lockfiles, advisories, transitive dependencies, SBOM context
FocusExact file location, rule context, severity, confidence, and remediation guidance.Boundary
SCA concepts, advisory evidence, transitive dependencies, and where SCA fits in review.A lockfile example, advisory identifier, affected package, and a clear remediation path.SCA cannot explain every unsafe code path or runtime behavior in the application itself.

From local signal to shared gate.

software composition analysis: Use the smallest workflow that proves value. Each later step should reuse evidence the team already understands. SCA concepts, advisory evidence, transitive dependencies, and where SCA fits in review.

StepCommand or actionDecision
1Run a quick local scanIs the signal useful?
2Inspect and repair findingsIs the fix specific and reproducible?
3Export portable evidenceDoes the reviewer need SARIF, JSON, or HTML?
4Promote the trusted threshold to CIWhich severity should block a pull request?
radar scan . --quick
radar scan . --format sarif --fail-on high

Evidence to inspect before you trust the result.

software composition analysis: A useful result must be explainable to a developer and portable to the next review surface. Inspect the concrete evidence below before changing team policy. A lockfile example, advisory identifier, affected package, and a clear remediation path.

  • Workflow: lockfiles · advisories · transitive dependencies · SBOM context
  • Exact file location, rule context, severity, confidence, and remediation guidance.
  • Terminal output, SARIF, JSON, or HTML artifacts generated from the same finding set.
  • Source stays in the workspace or CI runner where the scan executes.

Good fit and limits

Use software composition analysis when Developers learning how dependency and lockfile risk differs from source-code risk. Keep the boundary explicit: SCA cannot explain every unsafe code path or runtime behavior in the application itself.

Run the local proof before adopting a shared gate.

  • Good fit: Developers learning how dependency and lockfile risk differs from source-code risk.
  • Not a fit / do not overreach: SCA cannot explain every unsafe code path or runtime behavior in the application itself.

Questions to verify before rollout

These questions keep the decision tied to observable evidence rather than a broad product promise.

What does software composition analysis cover in practice?

software composition analysis: The practical scope is SCA concepts, advisory evidence, transitive dependencies, and where SCA fits in review.. Start with the listed entities or files and confirm the result on representative code.

Which evidence should I inspect for software composition analysis?

software composition analysis: Inspect A lockfile example, advisory identifier, affected package, and a clear remediation path. Keep the source location, rule or comparison context, and exported artifact together.

What should I not infer from software composition analysis?

software composition analysis: Do not infer universal coverage. SCA cannot explain every unsafe code path or runtime behavior in the application itself. Use the relevant comparison or workflow page to test the boundary before changing policy.

What should I try first for software composition analysis?

software composition analysis: Start with a local run, review one real finding, then choose the linked report, agent, CI, or trust workflow that matches the next decision.

Feature: dependency scannerChoose the next page that matches the remaining implementation or evaluation step.Feature: sastChoose the next page that matches the remaining implementation or evaluation step.Guide: sast vs scaChoose the next page that matches the remaining implementation or evaluation step.
Guide

Start with the problem you need to solve.

Open page →
Local SASTLocal SAST for Developers and CI

Developer-first static application security testing that scans source locally, emits SARIF for GitHub code scanning, and gives coding agents deterministic fix context.

ProofSee sample report

Inspect the fields and formats in a sample finding.

InstallInstall Radar

Run a local scan on a real repository.

Validate the workflow on your own code.

Start with one local scan, inspect the evidence, and expand to reports, agents, or CI only when the signal is useful.

Apply this guide locallyInspect product evidence