Code RadarLOCAL SAST GATE
AccountGitHubInstall Radar

SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review.

Radar emits compact terminal summaries and structured evidence for GitHub code scanning, CI artifacts, local review, and automation.

Run this check locallyInspect sample finding
radar scan . --quick

Four outputs

Use terminal output for local work, SARIF scanner output for GitHub code scanning SARIF workflows, JSON security scan reports for automation, and HTML code security reports for review artifacts.

radar scan . --format html > radar.html
radar scan . --format sarif --fail-on high
Evidence

Evidence to inspect

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

CriterionEvidence to inspectBoundary
Input scopeSelected files, configuration, scan mode, and enabled rules.Only included paths and configured checks are evaluated.
Finding detailFile, line, rule ID, severity, explanation, and repair direction.Illustrative output is not a result from your repository.
Workflow handoffLocal result, report format, agent context, and optional CI signal.Enable exports or CI only when the workflow needs them.
Decision fitUse the same criteria on a real repository before choosing a plan or tool.No universal winner or guaranteed outcome is claimed.
Evidence

Run this check locally

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

Run this check locally

SARIF report generator

Radar is a SARIF report generator and code review report tool for third-party code scanning tool GitHub workflows that need the first lane to fix instead of unrelated alerts.

Where SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review fits in a real review

SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review is useful only when it changes a concrete decision before code merges.

Radar emits compact terminal summaries and structured evidence for GitHub code scanning, CI artifacts, local review, and automation. For SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review, that promise should be tested on representative code rather than accepted as a feature-list claim.

Use terminal output for local work, SARIF scanner output for GitHub code scanning SARIF workflows, JSON security scan reports for automation, and HTML code security reports for review artifacts.

The page-specific signals to inspect for SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review are Four outputs; SARIF report generator. They should lead to an affected file, an understandable reason, and a next action a developer can verify.

Radar is a SARIF report generator and code review report tool for third-party code scanning tool GitHub workflows that need the first lane to fix instead of unrelated alerts.

How to evaluate SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review without guesswork

Use the same three checkpoints for SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review: local signal, portable evidence, and a shared policy only after the first two are trusted.

A feature such as SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review earns adoption when its output is specific enough to fix locally and stable enough to reuse in reports, agents, or CI.

CheckpointWhat to inspectDecision it supports
Local signalFour outputs; SARIF report generatorWhether SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review produces useful evidence before a pull request exists.
Review artifactRadar is a SARIF report generator and code review report tool for third-party code scanning tool GitHub workflows that need the first lane to fix instead of unrelated alerts.Whether SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review remains understandable outside the terminal.
Shared policyUse terminal output for local work, SARIF scanner output for GitHub code scanning SARIF workflows, JSON security scan reports for automation, and HTML code security reports for review artifacts.Whether SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review is trusted enough to block or guide shared review.

A practical workflow for SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review

Adopt SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review in a short loop that can be inspected and reversed.

Start SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review on a branch with a relevant change, inspect the finding location and explanation, then export only the artifact the next reviewer needs.

For SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review, add MCP, hooks, or CI after the local result is useful; the integration should reuse the finding rather than create a second source of truth.

StepActionExpected proof
1Run SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review locallyFile-level finding and explanation
2Repair and rescanThe finding is resolved or deliberately reviewed
3Export the useful formatA reviewer receives the same evidence
4Add a narrow gateOnly an agreed severity blocks merge
radar scan . --quick
radar scan . --format html > radar.html
radar scan . --format sarif --fail-on high

Limits and safe adoption for SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review

SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review does not replace architecture review, runtime testing, penetration testing, or human ownership. Static findings are evidence that still needs repository context.

Prove SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review on one representative repository before turning it into team policy.

Questions teams ask about SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review

These answers keep SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review tied to observable evidence and a clear next step.

What should I verify first for SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review?

Start with the affected file, rule explanation, severity, confidence, and repair direction. For SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review, the intended outcome is: Radar emits compact terminal summaries and structured evidence for GitHub code scanning, CI artifacts, local review, and automation.

Does SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review require source-code upload?

No. Code Radar scans in the local workspace or CI runner. Validate the page-specific evidence—Four outputs; SARIF report generator—without sending repository source to a Code Radar analysis service.

When should SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review become a CI gate?

Make SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review a shared gate only after local findings are trusted, the severity threshold is documented, and reviewers can see the same evidence in SARIF or another chosen report.

Continue the SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review decision

Use these pages to move from SARIF, JSON, HTML, and terminal reports for code security review to product proof, implementation, or a buying decision without creating a duplicate path.

Inspect sample evidenceInspect finding detail and report structure before rollout.Open implementation docsFollow the exact command sequence, expected output, and failure path.Build a pull-request gatePromote trusted local findings into SARIF and an explicit fail threshold.Compare plansChoose a paid boundary only after the repeat workflow is clear.
Evidence

Start with the problem you need to solve.

Open page →
WorkflowGitHub Actions security gate

Move trusted findings into a reviewable CI threshold.

ProofSee sample report

Inspect the fields and formats in a sample finding.

DocsReport output docs

Use exact commands for terminal, JSON, SARIF, and HTML.

Validate the workflow on your own code.

Start with one local scan, inspect the evidence, and expand to reports, agents, or CI only when the signal is useful.

Run this check locallyInspect sample finding