Code RadarLOCAL SAST GATE
AccountGitHubInstall Radar

Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings.

Radar focuses on source-code vulnerabilities reviewers need before merge: injection paths, unsafe auth, traversal, secrets, and risky APIs.

Run this check locallyInspect sample finding
radar scan . --quick

Local static checks

Rules run in the local engine and produce actionable finding records with file, severity, confidence, and fix guidance.

  • SQL injection
  • Command injection
  • Path traversal
  • Hardcoded secrets
Rules

Evidence to inspect

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

CriterionEvidence to inspectBoundary
Input scopeSelected files, configuration, scan mode, and enabled rules.Only included paths and configured checks are evaluated.
Finding detailFile, line, rule ID, severity, explanation, and repair direction.Illustrative output is not a result from your repository.
Workflow handoffLocal result, report format, agent context, and optional CI signal.Enable exports or CI only when the workflow needs them.
Decision fitUse the same criteria on a real repository before choosing a plan or tool.No universal winner or guaranteed outcome is claimed.
Rules

Run this check locally

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

Run this check locally

Evidence over scores

Each finding can include why it matters, how to fix it, and a copy-ready prompt for your coding agent.

Where Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings fits in a real review

Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings is useful only when it changes a concrete decision before code merges.

Radar focuses on source-code vulnerabilities reviewers need before merge: injection paths, unsafe auth, traversal, secrets, and risky APIs. For Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings, that promise should be tested on representative code rather than accepted as a feature-list claim.

Rules run in the local engine and produce actionable finding records with file, severity, confidence, and fix guidance.

The page-specific signals to inspect for Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings are SQL injection; Command injection; Path traversal; Hardcoded secrets. They should lead to an affected file, an understandable reason, and a next action a developer can verify.

Each finding can include why it matters, how to fix it, and a copy-ready prompt for your coding agent.

How to evaluate Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings without guesswork

Use the same three checkpoints for Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings: local signal, portable evidence, and a shared policy only after the first two are trusted.

A feature such as Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings earns adoption when its output is specific enough to fix locally and stable enough to reuse in reports, agents, or CI.

CheckpointWhat to inspectDecision it supports
Local signalSQL injection; Command injection; Path traversal; Hardcoded secretsWhether Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings produces useful evidence before a pull request exists.
Review artifactEach finding can include why it matters, how to fix it, and a copy-ready prompt for your coding agent.Whether Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings remains understandable outside the terminal.
Shared policyRules run in the local engine and produce actionable finding records with file, severity, confidence, and fix guidance.Whether Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings is trusted enough to block or guide shared review.

A practical workflow for Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings

Adopt Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings in a short loop that can be inspected and reversed.

Start Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings on a branch with a relevant change, inspect the finding location and explanation, then export only the artifact the next reviewer needs.

For Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings, add MCP, hooks, or CI after the local result is useful; the integration should reuse the finding rather than create a second source of truth.

StepActionExpected proof
1Run Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings locallyFile-level finding and explanation
2Repair and rescanThe finding is resolved or deliberately reviewed
3Export the useful formatA reviewer receives the same evidence
4Add a narrow gateOnly an agreed severity blocks merge
radar scan . --quick
radar scan . --format html > radar.html
radar scan . --format sarif --fail-on high

Limits and safe adoption for Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings

Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings does not replace architecture review, runtime testing, penetration testing, or human ownership. Static findings are evidence that still needs repository context.

Prove Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings on one representative repository before turning it into team policy.

Questions teams ask about Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings

These answers keep Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings tied to observable evidence and a clear next step.

What should I verify first for Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings?

Start with the affected file, rule explanation, severity, confidence, and repair direction. For Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings, the intended outcome is: Radar focuses on source-code vulnerabilities reviewers need before merge: injection paths, unsafe auth, traversal, secrets, and risky APIs.

Does Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings require source-code upload?

No. Code Radar scans in the local workspace or CI runner. Validate the page-specific evidence—SQL injection; Command injection; Path traversal; Hardcoded secrets—without sending repository source to a Code Radar analysis service.

When should Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings become a CI gate?

Make Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings a shared gate only after local findings are trusted, the severity threshold is documented, and reviewers can see the same evidence in SARIF or another chosen report.

Continue the Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings decision

Use these pages to move from Source code vulnerability scanner with actionable findings to product proof, implementation, or a buying decision without creating a duplicate path.

Review local SASTSee how source findings move from a local scan into review evidence.Explore detection rulesInspect risk, detection scope, remediation, and false-positive boundaries.Inspect sample evidenceInspect finding detail and report structure before rollout.Install RadarRun the smallest local proof on a repository your team actually reviews.
Rules

Start with the problem you need to solve.

Open page →
Local SASTLocal SAST for Developers and CI

Developer-first static application security testing that scans source locally, emits SARIF for GitHub code scanning, and gives coding agents deterministic fix context.

ProofSee sample report

Inspect the fields and formats in a sample finding.

InstallInstall Radar

Run a local scan on a real repository.

Validate the workflow on your own code.

Start with one local scan, inspect the evidence, and expand to reports, agents, or CI only when the signal is useful.

Run this check locallyInspect sample finding