Dependency scanning guide

See how Dependency scanning guide fits local review, which evidence Code Radar produces, where coverage ends, and how trusted findings move into CI.

radar scan . --quick

What Dependency scanning guide means here.

This guide answers what is software composition analysis directly, separates the concept from adjacent categories, and connects the decision to a practical local review workflow without overstating Code Radar coverage.

Evidence to inspect

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

CriterionEvidence to inspectBoundary
Input scopeSelected files, configuration, scan mode, and enabled rules.Only included paths and configured checks are evaluated.
Finding detailFile, line, rule ID, severity, explanation, and repair direction.Illustrative output is not a result from your repository.
Workflow handoffLocal result, report format, agent context, and optional CI signal.Enable exports or CI only when the workflow needs them.
Decision fitUse the same criteria on a real repository before choosing a plan or tool.No universal winner or guaranteed outcome is claimed.

Apply this guide locally

Verify the input scope, finding detail, workflow handoff, and product boundary before you install or buy.

The problem this page helps clarify

The useful question is where Dependency scanning guide changes the review loop: what enters the scan, who acts on a finding, and which evidence moves forward. Supported manifests, lockfile evidence, severity thresholds, and actionable dependency updates.

  • Audience: Teams adding dependency checks to the same loop as source review.
  • Focus: Supported manifests, lockfile evidence, severity thresholds, and actionable dependency updates.
  • Review question: What does Dependency scanning guide cover in practice?

Coverage and concrete signals

For Dependency scanning guide, inspect the concrete scope below instead of relying on a category label. A package advisory tied to the exact manifest or lockfile entry and its remediation.

  • Focus: Supported manifests, lockfile evidence, severity thresholds, and actionable dependency updates.
  • Workflow: Workflow: package manifests · lockfiles · advisories · SARIF
  • Coverage and concrete signals: package manifests, lockfiles, advisories, SARIF
FocusExact file location, rule context, severity, confidence, and remediation guidance.Boundary
Supported manifests, lockfile evidence, severity thresholds, and actionable dependency updates.A package advisory tied to the exact manifest or lockfile entry and its remediation.Coverage depends on manifests, lockfiles, advisory freshness, and the selected ecosystem.

From local signal to shared gate.

Dependency scanning guide: Use the smallest workflow that proves value. Each later step should reuse evidence the team already understands. Supported manifests, lockfile evidence, severity thresholds, and actionable dependency updates.

StepCommand or actionDecision
1Run a quick local scanIs the signal useful?
2Inspect and repair findingsIs the fix specific and reproducible?
3Export portable evidenceDoes the reviewer need SARIF, JSON, or HTML?
4Promote the trusted threshold to CIWhich severity should block a pull request?
radar scan . --quick
radar scan . --format sarif --fail-on high

Evidence to inspect before you trust the result.

Dependency scanning guide: A useful result must be explainable to a developer and portable to the next review surface. Inspect the concrete evidence below before changing team policy. A package advisory tied to the exact manifest or lockfile entry and its remediation.

  • Workflow: package manifests · lockfiles · advisories · SARIF
  • Exact file location, rule context, severity, confidence, and remediation guidance.
  • Terminal output, SARIF, JSON, or HTML artifacts generated from the same finding set.
  • Source stays in the workspace or CI runner where the scan executes.

Good fit and limits

Use Dependency scanning guide when Teams adding dependency checks to the same loop as source review. Keep the boundary explicit: Coverage depends on manifests, lockfiles, advisory freshness, and the selected ecosystem.

Run the local proof before adopting a shared gate.

  • Good fit: Teams adding dependency checks to the same loop as source review.
  • Not a fit / do not overreach: Coverage depends on manifests, lockfiles, advisory freshness, and the selected ecosystem.

Questions to verify before rollout

These questions keep the decision tied to observable evidence rather than a broad product promise.

What does Dependency scanning guide cover in practice?

Dependency scanning guide: The practical scope is Supported manifests, lockfile evidence, severity thresholds, and actionable dependency updates.. Start with the listed entities or files and confirm the result on representative code.

Which evidence should I inspect for Dependency scanning guide?

Dependency scanning guide: Inspect A package advisory tied to the exact manifest or lockfile entry and its remediation. Keep the source location, rule or comparison context, and exported artifact together.

What should I not infer from Dependency scanning guide?

Dependency scanning guide: Do not infer universal coverage. Coverage depends on manifests, lockfiles, advisory freshness, and the selected ecosystem. Use the relevant comparison or workflow page to test the boundary before changing policy.

What should I try first for Dependency scanning guide?

Dependency scanning guide: Start with a local run, review one real finding, then choose the linked report, agent, CI, or trust workflow that matches the next decision.

Validate the workflow on your own code.

Start with one local scan, inspect the evidence, and expand to reports, agents, or CI only when the signal is useful.