What is the fastest path for Code Radar GitHub Actions setup?
Code Radar GitHub Actions setup runs the scanner in pull requests, validates repository entitlement, publishes SARIF evidence, and fails risky PRs with an explicit severity threshold.
Docs
GitHub Actions
Run Radar as a GitHub Actions security scanner, fail risky PRs, and publish SARIF evidence.
Direct answer
GitHub Actions
Run Radar as a GitHub Actions security scanner, fail risky PRs, and publish SARIF evidence.
Which commands matter first for Code Radar GitHub Actions setup?
Start with `T-and-T-soft/code-radar@v1`, `RADAR_LICENSE_KEY`, `fail-on: high`, and `upload-sarif: true`. These commands keep implementation proof close to the repository instead of turning the docs page into a generic product description.
What evidence confirms Code Radar GitHub Actions setup works?
Confirm workflow YAML, SARIF upload, PR annotations, HTML artifacts, and a threshold that reviewers understand. This evidence should be visible before moving from documentation to a paid or shared workflow.
What should the reader avoid for Code Radar GitHub Actions setup?
Do not start with an aggressive fail-on policy before the same findings have been trusted locally. Next step: Use the GitHub Actions product page for CI purchase intent or pricing when repository slots are the blocker.
Content decision bridge
Turn GitHub Actions workflow into a product decision.
Readers on GitHub Actions need a short route from answer-seeking to proof, rollout, and purchase evidence. Run Radar as a GitHub Actions security scanner, fail risky PRs, and publish SARIF evidence.
Verify the proof surface.
GitHub Actions should lead to product proof, not only more reading. For this page, proof means SARIF output, a fail-on threshold, and reviewer-visible pull-request evidence.
github actions security scannerupload sarif github actions
Review CI proofApply the repeat workflow.
GitHub Actions becomes useful when the reader can repeat the workflow from the guide on a real repository. Here, rollout means a GitHub Actions workflow that can run the same scan shape repeatedly.
developer first sastlocal security review tool
Add workflowChoose the paid boundary.
GitHub Actions should create a purchase path only when the product owns the next repeated job. For this intent, buying is justified by repository slots and paid CI enforcement for shared team policy.
repository security gateteam sast pricing
Review CI plansWorkflow
Store `RADAR_LICENSE_KEY` in repository secrets, then run the action on pull requests.
uses: T-and-T-soft/code-radar@v1
with:
license-key: ${{ secrets.RADAR_LICENSE_KEY }}
fail-on: high
upload-sarif: "true"False positives
GitHub Actions uses the same engine-level exclusions as local CLI and MCP. A reviewed finding exclusion marks the finding as suppressed, so it does not fail `fail-on`, publish SARIF, or emit PR annotations.
[[exclusions.findings]]
rule_id = "SEC-SQLI-001"
path = "src/generated/**"
reason = "Generated query builder reviewed manually"Implementation FAQ
Confirm the command, expected evidence, failure boundary, and next workflow before treating the task as complete.
What is the fastest path for Code Radar GitHub Actions setup?
Code Radar GitHub Actions setup runs the scanner in pull requests, validates repository entitlement, publishes SARIF evidence, and fails risky PRs with an explicit severity threshold.
Which commands matter first for Code Radar GitHub Actions setup?
Start with `T-and-T-soft/code-radar@v1`, `RADAR_LICENSE_KEY`, `fail-on: high`, and `upload-sarif: true`. These commands keep implementation proof close to the repository instead of turning the docs page into a generic product description.
What evidence confirms Code Radar GitHub Actions setup works?
Confirm workflow YAML, SARIF upload, PR annotations, HTML artifacts, and a threshold that reviewers understand. This evidence should be visible before moving from documentation to a paid or shared workflow.
What should the reader avoid for Code Radar GitHub Actions setup?
Do not start with an aggressive fail-on policy before the same findings have been trusted locally. Next step: Use the GitHub Actions product page for CI purchase intent or pricing when repository slots are the blocker.