What is the fastest path for running local Code Radar scans?
Running local Code Radar scans means using the same engine for quick terminal feedback, HTML reports, JSON automation, and agent repair loops before a pull request exists.
Docs
Run local scans
Use local SAST and code-health scans for daily work, agent repair loops, and larger PRs.
Direct answer
Run local scans
Use local SAST and code-health scans for daily work, agent repair loops, and larger PRs.
Which commands matter first for running local Code Radar scans?
Start with `radar scan . --quick`, `radar scan . --format html > radar.html`, and `radar scan . --format json > radar.json`. These commands keep implementation proof close to the repository instead of turning the docs page into a generic product description.
What evidence confirms running local Code Radar scans works?
Confirm terminal findings, local report artifacts, file-level evidence, and repeatable output that can later move into MCP or CI. This evidence should be visible before moving from documentation to a paid or shared workflow.
What should the reader avoid for running local Code Radar scans?
Do not promote findings to a merge-blocking gate until reviewers agree the local signal is useful. Next step: Inspect report formats, connect MCP for agent repair, or add GitHub Actions when local findings should become shared policy.
Content decision bridge
Turn local scan workflow into a product decision.
Readers on Run local scans need a short route from answer-seeking to proof, rollout, and purchase evidence. Use local SAST and code-health scans for daily work, agent repair loops, and larger PRs.
Verify the proof surface.
Run local scans should lead to product proof, not only more reading. For this page, proof means a first local scan on real code with inspectable findings.
local security review toolcli security scan
Run local proofApply the repeat workflow.
Run local scans becomes useful when the reader can repeat the workflow from the guide on a real repository. Here, rollout means a repeatable local scan, report, hook, or agent handoff.
developer first sastlocal security review tool
Apply workflowChoose the paid boundary.
Run local scans should create a purchase path only when the product owns the next repeated job. For this intent, buying is justified by full local scans, exports, MCP, hooks, or repository validation.
repository security gateteam sast pricing
Review plansCommands
The same engine powers terminal summaries, TUI results, and report exports.
radar scan . --quick
radar scan . --format html > radar.html
radar scan . --format json > radar.jsonImplementation FAQ
Confirm the command, expected evidence, failure boundary, and next workflow before treating the task as complete.
What is the fastest path for running local Code Radar scans?
Running local Code Radar scans means using the same engine for quick terminal feedback, HTML reports, JSON automation, and agent repair loops before a pull request exists.
Which commands matter first for running local Code Radar scans?
Start with `radar scan . --quick`, `radar scan . --format html > radar.html`, and `radar scan . --format json > radar.json`. These commands keep implementation proof close to the repository instead of turning the docs page into a generic product description.
What evidence confirms running local Code Radar scans works?
Confirm terminal findings, local report artifacts, file-level evidence, and repeatable output that can later move into MCP or CI. This evidence should be visible before moving from documentation to a paid or shared workflow.
What should the reader avoid for running local Code Radar scans?
Do not promote findings to a merge-blocking gate until reviewers agree the local signal is useful. Next step: Inspect report formats, connect MCP for agent repair, or add GitHub Actions when local findings should become shared policy.